CS Processes
Stabilize Stage | $1-5M ARR | 10-30 headcount
Main challenge: Making growth repeatable. First hires, handoffs breaking.
Customer Success Processes
Onboarding
Stage-appropriate approach: Move from founder-led to CSM-led onboarding. Document the process so your first CS hire can run it. Keep it high-touch, but structured.
What changes at Stabilize:
- First CS hire owns onboarding — Founder steps back but stays accessible for escalations
- Process gets documented — Playbook, timeline, milestones, templates
- Onboarding becomes measurable — Time to value, completion rates, early churn signals
Stabilize stage onboarding structure:
| Phase | Timing | Owner | Key Activities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Handoff | Day 0 | AE → CSM | Internal handoff call, context transfer |
| Kickoff | Week 1 | CSM | Customer kickoff, goals alignment, success criteria |
| Setup | Week 1-2 | CSM + Customer | Configuration, data import, integrations |
| Training | Week 2-3 | CSM | User training, workflow setup |
| First value | Week 3-4 | CSM | Validate they've achieved initial goal |
| Transition | Week 4+ | CSM | Move to ongoing success cadence |
What to document:
- Kickoff deck — Standard presentation for first meeting
- Onboarding checklist — Steps, owners, completion criteria
- Training materials — Videos, docs, walkthroughs for common use cases
- Success criteria template — How to define and track success with customer
What NOT to do:
- Don't throw customers to the first CS hire without documentation — they'll fail
- Don't assume onboarding ends at go-live — first value is the milestone
- Don't skip the handoff — every customer needs context transfer
Playbook reference: → Onboarding and Process Improvement
Success Metrics
Stage-appropriate approach: Define what "success" looks like and track it consistently. Not health scoring yet, but real metrics that predict retention.
What to track at Stabilize:
| Metric | What It Reveals | How to Track |
|---|---|---|
| Login frequency | Are they using it? | Product analytics |
| Feature adoption | Are they getting full value? | Track key feature usage |
| Time to first value | How fast do they succeed? | Measure from go-live to first win |
| Support volume | Are they stuck? | Ticket count per customer |
| NPS/CSAT | How do they feel? | Survey at 30/60/90 days |
Defining success criteria:
Every customer should have documented success criteria:
- What outcome are they trying to achieve? (Not features, outcomes)
- How will we measure it? (Specific metrics or milestones)
- By when? (Timeline for expected value)
What NOT to do:
- Don't build elaborate health scores — you don't have enough data to calibrate
- Don't measure everything — pick 3-5 metrics that matter
- Don't let success be undefined — every customer should have documented goals
Playbook reference: → Customer Lifecycle (for success metrics framework)
Product Feedback Collection
Stage-appropriate approach: Move from ad-hoc founder conversations to structured collection. You have more customers now — need to capture, categorize, and prioritize systematically.
Feedback collection at Stabilize:
| Channel | Frequency | Owner | What You Learn |
|---|---|---|---|
| QBRs | Quarterly | CSM | Strategic needs, satisfaction |
| Support tickets | Ongoing | Support/CS | Pain points, bugs, gaps |
| NPS surveys | 30/60/90 days | CS | Sentiment, promoters/detractors |
| Feature requests | Ongoing | CS | What customers want to build |
| Churn interviews | Every churn | CS/Founder | Why customers leave |
How to process feedback:
- Capture in one place — Linear, Productboard, or even a spreadsheet
- Categorize — Bug, feature request, UX issue, integration, etc.
- Track frequency — "5 customers asked for X" is signal
- Share with product — Regular sync on customer feedback themes
What NOT to do:
- Don't let feedback live in Slack/email — it gets lost
- Don't act on every request — look for patterns
- Don't filter feedback before product sees it — let product hear the raw voice
Renewal Process
Stage-appropriate approach: Move from founder-managed renewals to CSM-owned process. Document the timeline, triggers, and plays for different scenarios.
Renewal process for Stabilize:
| Timing | Action | Owner | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90 days out | Renewal identified, health assessed | CSM | Flag at-risk accounts |
| 60 days out | Renewal conversation started | CSM | Business review, value recap |
| 30 days out | Terms finalized, contract sent | CSM | Involve AE if expansion opportunity |
| 14 days out | Follow-up on signature | CSM | Escalate if stuck |
| 0 days | Renewal complete or churned | CSM | Document outcome and reason |
Renewal health indicators:
- Usage trending up — Good sign, lead with expansion conversation
- Usage flat — Validate they're getting value, address issues
- Usage declining — Red flag, intervention needed before renewal conversation
- No engagement — Immediate outreach, find out what's happening
Handling at-risk renewals:
- Identify early — Don't wait until 30 days out
- Understand the issue — Is it product, value, champion change, budget?
- Create a plan — What would make them renew? Be specific.
- Escalate if needed — Founder/exec involvement for strategic accounts
- Document regardless — Win or lose, capture the learning
What NOT to do:
- Don't let renewals sneak up on you — track them proactively
- Don't treat every churn as preventable — some customers were never good fit
- Don't discount without understanding — price isn't usually the real issue
Playbook reference: → Renewal, Churn, NRR, GRR Reporting
Expansion & Upsell
Stage-appropriate approach: Move from opportunistic to identified. Know which customers are expansion candidates and have a light-touch process for pursuing.
Expansion signals to track:
| Signal | What It Means | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Hitting usage limits | They need more capacity | Upgrade conversation |
| New use cases | They want to do more with you | Expansion scoping |
| New stakeholders | Other teams interested | Land & expand opportunity |
| Renewal coming up | Natural conversation point | Multi-year or expansion deal |
| Strong NPS/satisfaction | They like you, might buy more | Reference or expansion ask |
Expansion process for Stabilize:
- CSM identifies opportunities — Based on signals above
- CSM qualifies interest — "We've noticed you're hitting limits. Would you like to discuss options?"
- AE or CSM closes — Depending on deal size and complexity
- Track expansion ARR — Separate from new logo, measure it
What NOT to do:
- Don't push expansion on unhappy customers — fix the issue first
- Don't surprise customers with upsell in every call — build trust
- Don't leave expansion to chance — track signals systematically
Reference & Testimonial Generation
Stage-appropriate approach: Build a systematic program. You need more references as your pipeline grows. Proactive asks, tracked assets.
Reference asset types:
| Asset Type | Effort | Value | How Many You Need |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logo permission | Low | Medium | As many as possible |
| Quote | Low | Medium | 5-10 for different personas/use cases |
| Case study | Medium | High | 2-3 detailed ones |
| Reference call | Low | Very High | 3-5 reliable references |
| Video testimonial | Medium-High | High | 1-2 for website/sales |
How to systematize:
- Track reference status — Field in CRM: willing to reference? what type?
- Build reference roster — Know who can speak to what use case
- Ask at the right time — After success milestone, positive NPS, renewal
- Make it easy — Draft quotes, schedule calls, handle logistics
Reference program basics:
- Every QBR, assess — Would this customer be a reference? What type?
- Track requests — Don't over-use the same 3 customers
- Thank references — Recognition, swag, early access to features
What NOT to do:
- Don't ask customers who aren't successful — awkward for everyone
- Don't over-use your best references — they'll burn out
- Don't promise references to sales before checking with customers
Support
Stage-appropriate approach: First support hire or first support tool. Move from founder inbox to structured support process.
Support model for Stabilize:
| Option | When It Works | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| First support hire | High-touch product, complex onboarding | Most common path |
| CS handles support | Low volume, CSMs have capacity | Can overload CSMs |
| Founder + tool | Very low volume, simple product | Not sustainable long-term |
Support infrastructure:
| Need | Tool Options | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Ticketing | Intercom, Zendesk, Front | One place for all requests |
| Knowledge base | Notion, Intercom, Help Scout | Self-serve common questions |
| Live chat | Intercom, Crisp | Fast response for simple issues |
| Escalation path | Internal process | How does support → CS → eng work? |
Support metrics to track:
- First response time — How fast do you reply?
- Resolution time — How fast do you solve?
- Ticket volume — Trending up (bad) or down (good)?
- CSAT on support — Are customers happy with support experience?
What NOT to do:
- Don't let support become a black hole — visibility matters
- Don't expect first support hire to figure it out alone — document process
- Don't ignore support patterns — they're product feedback
Playbook reference: → Support System Implementation